<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Add growth management to a busy legislative session	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/add-growth-management-to-a-busy-legislative-session/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/add-growth-management-to-a-busy-legislative-session/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 02:47:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The day that was at the Florida Capitol - March 25 - SaintPetersBlog		</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/add-growth-management-to-a-busy-legislative-session/#comment-83251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The day that was at the Florida Capitol - March 25 - SaintPetersBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=187302#comment-83251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] A House subcommittee Wednesday took a big bite out of Florida’s growth management laws. Cities, counties and environmentalists objected to an amendment that eliminates the “development of regional impact review” of proposed developments and also requires a private property rights provision in local comprehensive land-use plans. The story is here.  [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A House subcommittee Wednesday took a big bite out of Florida’s growth management laws. Cities, counties and environmentalists objected to an amendment that eliminates the “development of regional impact review” of proposed developments and also requires a private property rights provision in local comprehensive land-use plans. The story is here.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
