<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: And now City Council candidate Steve Galvin is cribbin&#8217; lines from his opponent, Amy Foster	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/and-now-city-council-candidate-steve-galvin-is-cribbin-lines-from-his-opponent-amy-foster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/and-now-city-council-candidate-steve-galvin-is-cribbin-lines-from-his-opponent-amy-foster/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Keith Lewis Simmons		</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/and-now-city-council-candidate-steve-galvin-is-cribbin-lines-from-his-opponent-amy-foster/#comment-47126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Lewis Simmons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=109911#comment-47126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, stupid mistake? But really, aren&#039;t BOTH these campaigns cribbing standard fundraising crap? Woops, caught only changing two words. Does that mean Foster changed more or less from the source they got this drivel from? Well, one used it first, I suppose, but how does that apply to an awkward pile of cliches? The first one flows a little better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, stupid mistake? But really, aren&#8217;t BOTH these campaigns cribbing standard fundraising crap? Woops, caught only changing two words. Does that mean Foster changed more or less from the source they got this drivel from? Well, one used it first, I suppose, but how does that apply to an awkward pile of cliches? The first one flows a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
