<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Confirmed: St. Petersburg Times dropping lawsuit fighting City of St. Petersburg&#8217;s solicitation ban	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/report-st-petersburg-times-drops-lawsuit-fighting-city-of-st-petersburgs-solicitation-ban-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/report-st-petersburg-times-drops-lawsuit-fighting-city-of-st-petersburgs-solicitation-ban-2/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 02:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vivid		</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/report-st-petersburg-times-drops-lawsuit-fighting-city-of-st-petersburgs-solicitation-ban-2/#comment-87281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://saintpetersblog.com/?p=5993#comment-87281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why would the City eat legal fees for defending Solicitation Ba? Just encourages the next litigious clown. The Times doesn&#039;t have a case or they would prosecute it. The city called their bluff now the city needs to go get paid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the City eat legal fees for defending Solicitation Ba? Just encourages the next litigious clown. The Times doesn&#8217;t have a case or they would prosecute it. The city called their bluff now the city needs to go get paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
