<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Allen Winsor &#8211; SaintPetersBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/tag/allen-winsor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Horse breeders can challenge divvying up of award money, court says</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/horse-breeders-can-challenge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Rosica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statewide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st District of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen Winsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belinda M. Kitos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breeders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Business and Professional Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Thoroughbred Breeders & Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horsemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert J. Kitos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Makar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Cross Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoroughbred horses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://saintpetersblog.com/?p=284927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Horse breeders have legal standing to &#8220;challenge the annual plan for distribution of owners’ and breeders’ awards,&#8221; according to a unanimous appeals court decision Monday. In a case ultimately about who controls the money and how much goes back to horsemen and breeders, Southern Cross Farm (SCF) had appealed a ruling from state gambling regulators. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation said the Ocala horse breeder couldn&#8217;t challenge the doling out of money from a pool managed by the nonprofit Florida&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices hear arguments on proposed solar power amendment</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/justices-hear-arguments-on-proposed-solar-power-amendment/</link>
					<comments>https://saintpetersblog.com/justices-hear-arguments-on-proposed-solar-power-amendment/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Rosica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statewide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen Winsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Pariente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Nabors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Power & Light Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floridians for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Power Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Bondi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Electric Co.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=239106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Florida Supreme Court justices on Tuesday heard both sides of a proposed constitutional amendment on solar-generated electricity. Lawyers for its proponents and opponents presented their cases to the court as part of a required legal review. Proposed amendments can deal with only one subject and the summary that voters see on the ballot can&#8217;t be misleading. The amendment is aiming to get on the 2016 ballot. Bob Nabors, lawyer for amendment sponsor Floridians for Solar Choice, told the court the question isn&#8217;t about the&#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://saintpetersblog.com/justices-hear-arguments-on-proposed-solar-power-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
