<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Barndhardt &#8211; SaintPetersBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/tag/barndhardt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 21:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>One challenge to Charlotte&#8217;s Web tossed, two more still pending</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/one-challenge-to-charlottes-web-tossed-two-more-still-pending/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Call]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statewide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barndhardt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte’s Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=224641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A challenge to a proposed regulatory structure for the state’s medicinal marijuana law has been dismissed. Judge Elizabeth W. McArthur ruled Thursday the attorneys for a 4-year-old Jacksonville girl failed to prove their client is a “qualified patient” under the Compassionate Medicinal Cannabis Act of 2014 and therefore lacks standing as an affected party to block the proposed rule. The ruling is here. It was handed down in a case filed on behalf of a Daliah Barnhardt; you can read a&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
