<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bob Nabors &#8211; SaintPetersBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/tag/bob-nabors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Lawyer for solar initiative predicts &#8216;no fiscal impact&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/lawyer-for-solar-initiative-predicts-no-fiscal-impact/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Rosica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statewide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Nabors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers for Smart Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Division of Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floridians for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal McAliley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando Garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White & Case]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=244748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The lawyer for the group behind one of two proposed constitutional amendments on solar power Monday told a panel of state economists he expected the initiative would have &#8220;no fiscal impact&#8221; if passed. Attorney Neal McAliley of the White &#38; Case law firm, representing Consumers for Smart Solar, spoke before the Financial Impact Estimating Conference on Monday. McAliley told the panel the amendment essentially would be a net wash on state finances. According to its ballot summary, it would create a constitutional right &#8220;for&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices hear arguments on proposed solar power amendment</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/justices-hear-arguments-on-proposed-solar-power-amendment/</link>
					<comments>https://saintpetersblog.com/justices-hear-arguments-on-proposed-solar-power-amendment/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Rosica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statewide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen Winsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Pariente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Nabors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Energy Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Power & Light Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floridians for Solar Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Power Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Bondi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Electric Co.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=239106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Florida Supreme Court justices on Tuesday heard both sides of a proposed constitutional amendment on solar-generated electricity. Lawyers for its proponents and opponents presented their cases to the court as part of a required legal review. Proposed amendments can deal with only one subject and the summary that voters see on the ballot can&#8217;t be misleading. The amendment is aiming to get on the 2016 ballot. Bob Nabors, lawyer for amendment sponsor Floridians for Solar Choice, told the court the question isn&#8217;t about the&#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://saintpetersblog.com/justices-hear-arguments-on-proposed-solar-power-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
