<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LGBT issues &#8211; SaintPetersBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/tag/lgbt-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Pinellas Charter Review Commission unanimously votes against including recall provisions</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/pinellas-charter-review-commission-unanimously-votes-against-including-recall-provisions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devon Crumpacker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Bay and the 'Burg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-partisan elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinellas County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinellas County Charter Review Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall procedures]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=249028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Proponents of recall provisions for elected officers in Pinellas County may have cause for both celebration and defeat. During Pinellas&#8217; January 6 charter review commission meeting, board members examined the topic, but unanimously voted against further pursuing it &#8212; and ultimately against adding it to the 2016 ballot &#8212; deciding that the measure is already enforced enough throughout the county.      According to Florida Statute, any member of the governing body of a municipality or charter county &#8220;may be&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
