<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>solar amendments &#8211; SaintPetersBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/tag/solar-amendments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Mason-Dixon solar poll: Salt Shaker Test</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/mason-dixon-solar-poll-salt-shaker-test/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Vancore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Statewide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mason-Dixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Preference Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Shaker Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar amendments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spb.wpengine.com/?p=236590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mason-Dixon recently released a new statewide poll testing the two pending solar amendments currently making their way through the process in Florida. Despite the fact that both dealt with a similar subject, solar power, it was a tale of two initiatives: one very passable and the other with seemingly no path to victory. The initiative backed by the solar industry (titled, “Limits or Prevents Barriers to Local Solar Electricity Supply) saw only 30 percent of respondents saying they would vote&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
