<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>standards editor &#8211; SaintPetersBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://saintpetersblog.com/tag/standards-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Life and politics from the Sunshine State&#039;s best city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 02:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>NYT standards editor says he didn&#8217;t try to &#8216;ban&#8217; the use of &#8216;tweet&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/nyt-standards-editor-says-he-didnt-try-to-ban-the-use-of-tweet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Schorsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloquial tone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://saintpetersblog.com/?p=5967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The word can be used for special effect, says Phil Corbett, &#8220;or in places where a colloquial tone is appropriate, but should not be used routinely in straight news articles.&#8221; He adds: &#8220;Of the dozens of blogs and web sites worldwide that weighed in, exactly two actually contacted me directly to ask about the issue.&#8221;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT standards editor says he didn&#8217;t try to &#8216;ban&#8217; the use of &#8216;tweet&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/nyt-standards-editor-says-he-didnt-try-to-ban-the-use-of-tweet-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Schorsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Corbett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://saintpetersblog.com/?p=5967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The word can be used for special effect, says Phil Corbett, &#8220;or in places where a colloquial tone is appropriate, but should not be used routinely in straight news articles.&#8221; He adds: &#8220;Of the dozens of blogs and web sites worldwide that weighed in, exactly two actually contacted me directly to ask about the issue.&#8221;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times doesn&#8217;t recognize &#8216;Tweet&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/new-york-times-doesnt-recognize-tweet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Schorsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloquialisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jargon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neologisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Corbett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution of the language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://saintpetersblog.com/?p=5597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Phil Corbett, the latest standards editor at the Times (maybe the greatest job in the world?), has issued a proclamation! Yesterday, the following memo went out, asking writers to abstain from the invented past-tense and other weird iterations of the magical noun-verb &#8220;Twitter.&#8221; His case isn&#8217;t terrible, actually—and he offers this terrifying vision: &#8220;Someday, &#8216;tweet&#8217; may be as common as &#8216;e-mail.'&#8221; Oh dear. Well, read for yourself and decide. How About “Chirp”? Some social-media fans may disagree, but outside of ornithological&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times doesn&#8217;t recognize &#8216;Tweet&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://saintpetersblog.com/new-york-times-doesnt-recognize-tweet-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Schorsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloquialisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jargon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neologisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Corbett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution of the language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://saintpetersblog.com/?p=5597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Phil Corbett, the latest standards editor at the Times (maybe the greatest job in the world?), has issued a proclamation! Yesterday, the following memo went out, asking writers to abstain from the invented past-tense and other weird iterations of the magical noun-verb &#8220;Twitter.&#8221; His case isn&#8217;t terrible, actually—and he offers this terrifying vision: &#8220;Someday, &#8216;tweet&#8217; may be as common as &#8216;e-mail.'&#8221; Oh dear. Well, read for yourself and decide. How About “Chirp”? Some social-media fans may disagree, but outside of ornithological&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
