Bob Woodward on the Washington Post op-ed page explains “Why Obama picked Hagel”: In the first months of the Obama presidency in 2009, Chuck Hagel, who had just finished two terms as a US senator, went to the White House to visit with the friend he had made during the four years they overlapped in the Senate. So, President Obama asked, what do you think about foreign policy and defense issues? According to an account that Hagel later gave, and is reported here for the first time, he told Obama: ‘We are at a time where there is a new world order. We don’t control it. You must question everything, every assumption, everything they’ – the military and diplomats – ‘tell you. Any assumption 10 years old is out of date. You need to question our role. You need to question the military. You need to question what are we using the military for. Afghanistan will be defining for your presidency in the first term,’ Hagel also said, according to his own account, ‘perhaps even for a second term.’The key was not to get ‘bogged down.’
Obama did not say much but listened. At the time, Hagel considered Obama a ‘loner,’ inclined to keep a distance and his own counsel. But Hagel’s comments help explain why Obama nominated his former Senate colleague to be his next secretary of defense. The two share similar views and philosophies as t
he Obama administration attempts to define the role of the United States in the transition to a post-superpower world. This worldview is part hawk and part dove. … It holds that the Afghanistan war has been mismanaged and the Iraq war unnecessary. War is an option, but very much a last resort. … The bottom line: The United States must get out of these massive land wars – Iraq and Afghanistan – and, if possible, avoid future large-scale war. … When I interviewed President Obama in the summer of 2010 for my book ‘Obama’s Wars,’ his deeply rooted aversion to war was evident.