A pivotal hearing in a lawsuitĀ over the state’s environmental funding is coming up in December.
Lawyers for the Legislature and environmental advocacy groups are set to argue over a summary judgment motion Dec. 5 before Circuit Judge Charles W. Dodson in Tallahassee.
GrantingĀ such motions allows parties to win a case without a trial.
Florida Wildlife Federation, Sierra ClubĀ and others had filed suit over the “Water andĀ Land Legacy Amendment,” the constitutional changeĀ approved by voters in 2014Ā that mandates state spending for land and water conservation.
āPlaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment because (the amendment)Ā prohibits the Legislature from appropriating land acquisition and restoration funds for any other purpose, but the Legislature appropriated most Amendment 1Ā monies to salaries and ordinary expenses of four state agencies,ā their motion says.
Those agencies areĀ the Department of Environmental Protection, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,Ā the Department of State, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Attorneys for state lawmakersĀ responded: “While plaintiffs might have struck a different balance than that struck by the LegislatureĀ … the Constitution commits that policy decision to the Legislature. Within constitutional limits, the Legislature alone is responsible for the appropriation of public funds.”
Amendment 1 requires state officials to set aside 33 percent of the money from theĀ real estate ādocumentary stampā tax to protect Floridaās environmentally sensitive areas for 20 years. This year, that number is expected to total more than $740 million.
The amendment, which needed a minimum of 60 percent to pass, got a landslide of nearly 75 percent, or more than 4.2 million āyesā votes.